|
Post by kugelfang on Feb 19, 2017 22:15:42 GMT
Very impressive and a grand sight, too!
--jeff
|
|
|
Post by davel on Mar 14, 2017 7:20:17 GMT
As some of you know, Simon Miller has been developing rules for the ECW using his To The Strongest rules format. He's going to be at the Partizan Show on 21st May, and he's putting on a demo game featuring the ECW, so if you're going to the show, come and take a look.
He's very kindly said I can join in, so please introduce yourselves if you come along. Also, Simon's games are participation games, so if you're looking for an ECW set of rules, come and have a look/go.
Best Wishes Dave
|
|
|
Post by spiritofethandune on Mar 14, 2017 18:30:11 GMT
Hi Dave,
I saw Simon's ECW rules in action at the 2017 TtS World Championships at Chalgrove last month. He put on a 10mm game of Edgehill. I didn't take part but it looked really good.
Best wishes Anthony
|
|
dirk
Lance Corporal
Posts: 30
|
Post by dirk on Mar 25, 2017 21:40:34 GMT
Hi, Did have a large ECW project in 2013: Marston Moor: marstonmoor54mm.blogspot.be/Deived an ECW rule "About Cromwell" from previous developed rules. Converted a lot of figures, cerntainly to have Covenanters. Dirk
|
|
|
Post by davel on Mar 25, 2017 22:58:05 GMT
Hi Dirk,
Great pictures on the link you sent. Like your Ancient rules, it was the About Cromwell rules that has started to get me painting 54mm ECW figures. Only 2 units painted so far, but hopefully more on the way.
Your About Bonaparte was also responsible for starting my 54mm Peninsular War collection. Again, figures under the paint brush, but hopefully ready by next year.
Think we'll have to put up a war ingredients sign - "Dirk's rules can play havoc with your wallet!!!!!" Looking forward to my Ancient, ECW and Napoleonic games using your rules.
For those who haven't seen them, they're well worth a read. Very readable, straightforward and easy to follow.
Best Wishes Dave
|
|
dirk
Lance Corporal
Posts: 30
|
Post by dirk on Mar 27, 2017 21:03:42 GMT
Thanks Dave Luckely for your wallet, there are only 8 figures in a unit ;-) Now seriously, your kind words mean a lot to me, and it gives me pleasure I could make you enthousiastic about ECW. A conflict and period that has more dynamism and chalanges in it than a lot of wargamers think. For a 54mm wargamer, the biggest chalange is finding the right figures and a lot of converting. If you would like to share battle reports ad pics, i’ll send you an authors invite. Cheers Dirk
|
|
|
Post by spiritofethandune on Mar 27, 2017 21:34:26 GMT
Hi Dirk,
I have all three sets of your rules and like Dave I have read them through and really like them. I am currently badgering Mike to give the ECW rules a go as I have a 54mm ECW army painted up (enough for a brigade a side). I use Call to Arms figures which are great although they don't do any dragoons which is a shame.
Cheers Anthony
|
|
dirk
Lance Corporal
Posts: 30
|
Post by dirk on Mar 29, 2017 19:52:42 GMT
Hi Anthony, Impressed by your enthousiasm. Curious to know how your test will go. If you need advice, just give a sign. Also for you, if you would like to post battle reports in the Marston Moor blog, I'll send you an author invite. Concerning dragoons: Most of the ones I made, are conversions with the torso of A Call to Arms musketeers with the lower part of Hät Napoleonic French dragoons. The Convenanters: I made a conversion of metal figures and made models in silicone, and made the figures from two component resin. It was expensive and laborious. Wouldn't do it again. I have taken a look on the web: there are soem alternatives: found a site making French WWI soldier heads with the Alpine barret, but they are epensive: www.jonsmith-modellbau.com/products/132-54mm-single-heads/132-54mm-single-french-heads/ Also a site with metal heads: www.langley-models.co.uk/acatalog/Toy_Soldier_Heads__54mm_.htmlbut here the casting isn't very good. In a way I 'm surpised A Call To Amrs didn't make Scots, as they are such an import part in the War, and vital in the defeat of the king. You have also the campaigns of Montrose. And with the latter, you can even use clansmen. Cheers Dirk
|
|
dirk
Lance Corporal
Posts: 30
|
Post by dirk on Mar 30, 2017 21:09:37 GMT
Making heads for conversions, isn't that something Mike would try?
|
|
|
Post by spiritofethandune on Mar 30, 2017 21:41:44 GMT
Hi Dirk,
I'm sure my trusty comrade Mike will take pictures of our game-we're playing on Monday evening at the Guildford club. My ECW figures are based differently from your rules (they are on individual 40mm square bases for foot and 40mm x 80mm for horse), but I actually prefer your basing system. if all goes well with the game I may well re-base my ECW and Napoleonics to your specifications.
I would love to have your opinion on different sizes of 54mm figures. I have an army of Hat Prussian line infantry and Landwehr. I recently purchased Call to Arms French line infantry as opponents but was dismayed to find that the CTA figures are much thinner and shorter than the Hat figures-so much so that I think they will look awful on the same table together. Does that sort of thing bother you or do you cheerfully mix and match?
Best wishes Anthony
|
|
dirk
Lance Corporal
Posts: 30
|
Post by dirk on Apr 1, 2017 8:25:46 GMT
Hi Anthony. I have also a mixture of figures, including ACTA French infantry. I don't mind to have a mixture. In a way, it is foolish to to want only figures of the same hight, as, if we want to simulate reality, people also differ in length. Of course, i wouldn't use 40mm, but a mixutre of 54mm and 60mm , I don't see a problem, and also small size 54mm,.. why not. You could use those as light infantry, as most of the time, these were the smaller more agile soldiers.
Cheers
Dirk
|
|
|
Post by spiritofethandune on Apr 1, 2017 8:38:24 GMT
Hi Dirk,
Many thanks for your reply-using smaller figures as light infantry is pure genius!
Best wishes Anthony
|
|
dirk
Lance Corporal
Posts: 30
|
Post by dirk on Apr 1, 2017 12:51:14 GMT
Thanks Anthony. As we have not the luxury of a great variety in figures, one has to improvise.
Cheers Dirk
|
|
|
Post by davel on May 23, 2017 20:30:18 GMT
Hi. Just to let you know that I played the new To The Strongest ECW rules at Partizan last Sunday. Adapted by Andrew Brentnall, we used his fantastic collection of 10mm figures. It was a great game and Simon Miller is hoping to have them published later in the year.
They gave a great representation of ECW warfare. They obviously used the basic To The Strongest mechanisms, but with extras added on to give that ECW flavour. These included rules for using battalion guns and differences in the numbers of hits a unit could take depending on their training.
One really nice touch was the question mark counters placed by the units. As this was Edgehill, the first major encounter of the war, many units were untried in battle, so as this was their first encounter of battle, the markers were there to remind everyone that it was not clear how they would react to the battle.
So, when units came under fire or combat for the first time, they had to dice to see how they would react. If they picked a card (remember that TtS is card driven) that was equal to, or more than their saving role, they were deemed to be OK and fight the rest of the battle as normal.
If the unit drew a card that was less than their saving throw, they suffered from a bad reaction to the combat and were given a disruption counter.
A very nice touch I thought. As TtS uses a grid system, there is some scope for using these rules for 54mm gaming and they are well worth considering. They produced a great game and I would recommend them to any interested party.
The morning game was a marginal victory for the King (I played on Parliaments side!!!!!). The afternoon was a resounding success for Parliament (I played on the King's side!!!!!!)
Best Wishes Dave
|
|
|
Post by Mike Lewis on May 23, 2017 21:00:24 GMT
Anthony and I have been playing the To the Strongest Ancient rules with 28mm collections and really enjoying them. I'm looking forward to the ECW ruleset.
Trying to work out how to base figures up to be able to use a grid and still look okay. Most of the 54mm need at least 40mm depth to allow for the musket on the rest. If you base as 40mm square per figure, you could use a 200mm grid (8") and have 5 figures by 2 figures deep as a unit. The problem for me, in 54mm is representing a unit with sleeves of shot in such a tight space. Or does TTS treat the sleeves of shot as separate units?
Mike
|
|